Prostitution
The Human Cost
Across the world, wherever prostitution exits and no matter how it is ‘regulated’, the sex trade is usually entered into by already vulnerable, often abused individuals (frequently as a child). Once in it, the human cost is unimaginable. And unacceptable.
The Financial Cost

The sex trade is costing us a fortune’ Clara, formerly in prostitution. The cost of enabling the sex trade is immense (which is in stark contrast to the cost of shutting it down):
The Wider Impact

Prostitution isn’t just a ‘private matter between consensual parties’. It affects us all. From ‘no go’ areas in sex industry zones to far greater violence towards all women by sex buyers:
Approaches to Prostitution
These are the different ways of dealing with prostitution:
Work or Abuse?

Evidence from across the globe shows that legitimising profiteers and punters – particularly when the industry is also deregulated – makes the sex industry infinitely more harmful. The industry expands, so too does trafficking and child prostitution. Of course it does! You have given a ‘Green Light’ to abusers and to the profiteers who can make a fortune off the women and children in the sex trade. Worst of all, the entire sex trade then operates like an ‘underground’ industry.
By contrast, recognising prostitution as abuse drastically shrinks the industry (fewer buyers, many fewer sellers). With abusers (profiteers and punters) criminalised, the rights and safety of those in prostitution increases. And there is much less trafficking (as it is much less lucrative and harder for traffickers to operate).
Decrim – Country by Country

A ‘prostitution is work’ approach either means the industry is ‘fully decriminalised’ (sellers, punters and profiteers all decriminalised) with minimal state intervention or ‘legalised’ (everyone decriminalised but more state intervention). But see if you can spot the difference in this report.
Even the sex trade lobby admits the utter failure of legalisation (even though state control should offer more protection). And they now avidly lobby for ‘full decriminalisation’ aka ‘full decriminalisation, full deregulation’.
Either way, the following are the (surely entirely predictable) consequences of legitimising the sex trade:
Prostitution as Abuse

Survivors and their allies understand prostitution as abuse – inherently harmful, with uncontrollable levels of violence. This means all buyers and profiteers (‘pimps’) should be stopped, not legitimised. Those who sell sex should never be criminalised. So they advocate to end sex buying (surprisingly easily achieved), criminalise all profiteers/punters and support all who sell sex (including the 90% who want to escape). This is the ‘Nordic Model’. When properly implemented, this has proven hugely successful:
Prostitution – Inevitable?

One of the key arguments used against the idea of trying to end sex buying is that this is utterly impossible – prostitution is the ‘oldest profession’ (or rather oppression), totally inevitable and unstoppable. But actually it is extremely easy to stop sex buying – it can essentially be eradicated. Almost over night:
The ‘Johns’

Sex buyers almost invariably demonstrate dehumanising, if not horrific, attitudes towards the women they buy and towards women more generally – often inflicting violence on both. This is worst where the sex industry is legitimised because all this really legitimises are punters, pimps and traffickers & their attitudes and behaviours.
Online Pimping Sites
Most prostitution has moved online, dominated by a few giant corporates (many of whose directors are currently ‘lawyered up’ against charges of sex trafficking, fraud and other serious crime). All sites have meaningless safety measures in place and are the usual sex trade ‘Wild West’ of exploitation, paedophilia, trafficking and organised crime.
The sex work lobby demands that online pimping sites be worked with so the rampant abuse they harbour can be ‘regulated out’, claiming as always that if they are shut down the industry will ‘go underground’. But in the USA, legislation was passed to ban online pimping sites. This collapsed the market – no magical ‘underground industry’ materialised. By contrast, in the UK, policing bodies have been fruitlessly ‘working with’ online pimping sites as ‘key partners’ for years:
‘By Pimps, for Pimps’

How did the idea of ‘sex work’ and ‘decriminalising pimps’ gain such a foothold?
Global ‘sex work’ groups are frequently dominated by pimps (they are sex workers after all). And many of the most prominent global ‘sex work’ advocates are actually pimps.
Their big breakthrough came when a Sex Work group led by a known pimp lobbied UN Aids to adopt a ‘sex work’ policy. This pimp was then jailed for sex trafficking, but is still held up as a ‘human rights defender’ and the policy was never re-examined. Later, UN Women adopt the same policy. In the UK, the owner of the country’s largest pimping network successfully lobbied Amnesty International UK.
So for decades, Governments, Trade Unions, Human Rights groups, even anti-trafficking groups, have been doing exactly what pimps (hiding as ‘sex workers’) want, including funding them:
“Child Sex Workers”

The sex trade lobby not only defines children raped by men for money as ‘sex workers’, but so do many of those it has lobbied.
Fact or Fake?

Research supporting the ‘sex work’ lobby is shockingly biased (invariably carried out by prostitution advocates – even pimps) and equally shockingly poor quality. But it is often commissioned out to these vested interest groups by Governments, human rights groups and other respected bodies. ‘Peer reviewed’ papers (reviewed by the same cohort of pro-sex trade academics) are then published in leading journals and used to sway the public, decision makers and even anti-trafficking groups. The same academics carrying out this research typically also avidly lobby for pimp decriminalisation (frequently funded with public money and carried out in collaboration with the well respected bodies who have already succumbed to the notion that ‘decrim & dereg is best’).
Breaking the Law

There are numerous examples of how pro-sex trade decisions are anti-human rights and unlawful. All bodies that listen to ‘sex work’ advocates risk not only introducing immeasurably harmful policies but breaking the law. We have gathered just some examples of unlawful decision-making here:
Myths
When you hear something over and over again it becomes very hard not to believe it – that’s how our brains work. And the sex trade lobby is relying on that. That’s why you hear the same sound bites over and over. But think about it, does any of this really stack up?
‘You’re A *****!’
Pornogander

Mainstream and social media are, increasingly, little more than a pornagander tool for the sex trade lobby. This directly ‘grooms’ women and girls into the industry – survivors invariably testify that incessant normalising and glamorising influences their ‘choice’ to try ‘sex work’. How could it not? This is combined with a very large, highly mobilised, grass roots element and mass suppression and abuse against all alternative voices:
The Sex Trade & Covid

Clearly selling sex puts you at high risk of Covid (and multiple other risks). Where the sex trade has been legitimised, it was those still desperately selling sex who were criminalised, not buyers or profiteers. Meanwhile, it was ‘Sex Worker Unions’ leading the call for the industry to re-open, even during the midst of the pandemic, instead of demanding women are helped out of a totally unviable industry:
What Sex as Work means

Forms of Prostitution

From porn to escorting .. there might be many different forms of the sex trade, but there is extensive cross over with women often involved in multiple forms. And of course, the entire industry plays by the same rule book, whilst the harm to the women in these industries, and to the rest of society, is the same:
More
Pornography













